ALTUNAY, M. et al. A science driven production cyberinfrastructure—the open science grid. Journal of Grid Computing, v. 9, n. 2, p. 201–218, 2010.
ALVES, Alessandra Maria; BARBOSA, Ricardo Rodrigues. Colaboração e compartilhamento da informação no ambiente organizacional. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 11., 2010, Rio de Janeiro. Anais... Rio de Janeiro, 2010. Disponível em: <http://congresso.ibict.br/index.php/enancib/xienancib/paper/view/189/251>. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2010.
ANKLAM, Patti. The 3rd SM: Enterprise SM. Disponível em: <http://www.pattianklam.com/category/km/> , de 15 de abril de 2010. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2013.
ARAZY, O.; MORGAN, W.; PATTERSON, R. Wisdom of the crowds: decentralized knowledge construction in Wikipedia. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 8 dez. 2006. Disponível em: <http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1025624>. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2014.
ARBERSMAN, Samuel. The half-life of facts: why everything we know has an expiration date. New York: Penguin Group, 2012.
BECKER, Jonathan. Scholar 2.0: Public intellectualism meets the open web. The University Council for Educational Administration (UCEA). Disponível em: < http://www.ucea.org/special_feature_52_2_pcp/2011/6/16/scholar-20-public-intellectualism-meets-the-open-web.html >. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2012.
BERTIN, P. R. B.; FORTALEZA, J. M.; SUHET, A. R. Paradigma atual da comunicação científica e introdução da revista Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (PAB) no canal eletrônico. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 12, n. 3, p. 83-95, set./dez. 2007.
BETTENCOURT, M. P. da L.; CIANCONI, R. de B. Gestão do Conhecimento: um olhar sob a perspectiva da ciência da informação. Tendências da Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação, João Pessoa, v. 5, n. 1, 2013.
BORKO, H. Information science: what is it? American Documentation, v. 19, n. 1, 1968.
BOYD, D.; ELLISON, N. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, v.13, n.1, 2007. Disponível em: <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html>. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2014.
BOYER, E. Scholarship reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
BUSINESS DICTIONARY. Collaboration. Disponível em: <http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/collaboration.html>. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2014.
CAMPBELL, Philip et al. Science as an open enterprise: final report. The Royal Society. Disponível em: <http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-public-enterprise/report/>. Acesso em: 07 jul. 2012.
CARDON, Dominique. A inovação pelo uso. In: Desafio de Palavras: Enfoques Multiculturais sobre as Sociedades da Informação. Paris: C&F Éditions, 2005. Disponível em: <http://vecam.org/article591.html> Acessível em: 10 ago. 2014.
CARUSO, Fabiano. Curadoria digital – definição e seus viéses. Material de apoio para curso livre de capacitação profissional à distância. 2013.
CIANCONI, R.de B. A gestão de documentos, da informação e do conhecimento: contextualização e especificidades. In: CIANCONI, R. B. (Org.); CORDEIRO, R. I. N. (Org.); ALMEIDA, C. H. M. (Org.). Gestão do conhecimento, da informação e de documentos em contextos informacionais. Niterói, RJ: EDUFF, 2013. p. 107-125.
CATLIN-GROVES, Christina L. The citizen science landscape: from volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond. International Journal of Zoology, v. 2012, 2012.
CRIBB, J.; SARI, T. Open science: sharing knowledge in the global century. Collingwood, p. 1-20, 2010.
DALKIR, Kimiz. Knowledge sharing networks. In: CIANCONI, R. B. (Org.); CORDEIRO, R. I. N. (Org.); ALMEIDA, C. H. M. (Org.). Gestão do conhecimento, da informação e de documentos em contextos informacionais. Niterói, RJ: EDUFF, 2013. p. 13-26.
DALKIR, Kimiz.Knowledge management in theory and practice. 2 ed. London, M.I.T.Press, 2011.
DAVENPORT, Thomas; PRUSAK, Laurence. Conhecimento empresarial. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1998.
DE ROURE, D. et al. myExperiment: defining the social virtual research environment. In: IEEE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON eSCIENCE, 8., 2008, Indianapolis, Anais… 2008. p. 182–189.
___________; GOBLE, C. Software design for empowering scientists. IEEE Software, v. 26, n. 1, p. 88-95. 2009.
DECLARATION ON RESEARCH ASSESSMENT (DORA): San Francisco, CA. Disponível em: <http://am.ascb.org/dora/>. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2013.
FECHER, Benedikt; FRIESIKE, Sascha. Open science: one term, five schools of thought. 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.ratswd.de/dl/RatSWD_WP_218.pdf>. Acesso em: 28 de maio de 2013.
FRY, J et al. Identifying benefits arising from the curation and open sharing of research data produced by UK Higher Education and research institutes. 2008. Disponível em: < http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/279/2/JISC_data_sharing_finalreport.pdf>. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2014.
GANDEL, Paul B., KATZ, Richard N. METROS, Susan E. The weariness of the flesh:
reflections on the life of the mind in an era of abundance. EDUCAUSE Review, v. 39, n. 2, mar./abr. p. 40-51, 2004.
GLOBAL WEBINDEX. Trendstream. Disponível em: https://www.globalwebindex.net/the-data. Acesso em: 9 out 2014.
GOLDSTEIN, Harvey. Try DIY, not green or gold open access. Disponível em: < http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/opinion/try-diy-not-green-or-gold-open-access/2012953.article>. Acesso em: 01 maio 2014.
GONZÁLEZ DE GÓMEZ, Maria Nélida. Para uma reflexão epistemológica acerca da Ciência da Informação. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v. 6, n. 1, p. 5-18, 2001. Disponível em: <http://portaldeperiodicos.eci.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/search/authors/view?firstName=Maria%20Nélida%20González&middleName=&lastName=Gomez&affiliation=&country=>. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2012.
GURTEEN, David (ed.). Leading issues in social knowledge management. United Kingdom: Academic Publishing International, 2012.
HAEUSSLER, Carolin. Information-sharing in academia and the industry: a comparative study. Research Policy, v. 40, n. 1, p. 105–122, 2011.
HAND, E. Citizen science: people power. Nature, v. 466, n. 7307, p. 685-687, ago. 2010. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/466685a>. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2014.
HEY, T. Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science. Science, v. 308, n. 5723, p. 817–821, maio. 2005.
KAGAN, Jerome. The three cultures: natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
KONKIEL, Stacey. Altmetrics: A 21st-Century Solution to Determining Research Quality. Disponível em: <http://www.infotoday.com/OnlineSearcher/Articles/Features/Altmetrics-A-stCentury-Solution-to-Determining-Research-Quality-90551.shtml>. Acesso em: 10 out. 2014.
LIEVROUW, L. A. Social media and the production of knowledge: a return to little science? Social Epistemology, v. 24, n. 3, p. 219–237, jul. 2010.
LIN, Thomas. Defensores da ciência aberta escancaram processo científico. Veja, São Paulo, fev. 2012. Disponível em: <http://veja.abril.com.br/noticia/ciencia/ciencia-aberta-escancara-processo-cientifico>. Acesso em: 10 out. 2012.
MOSCHELLA, David et al. Consumerization of information technology. Leading Edge Forum, 2004. Disponível em: <http://lef.csc.com/projects/70>. Acesso em: 29 abr. 2014.
MUNFORD, Lewis. Authoritarian and democratic technics. Techonology and Culture, v. 5, p. 1–8, 1964.
NENTWICH, M.; KONIG, R. Cyberscience 2.0: research in the age of digital social networks, Frankfurt; New York: Campus Verlag. 2012.
NEYLON, C.; Wu, S. Open science: tools, approaches, and implications. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, p. 540–544, 2009. Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19209729>. Acessado em: 9 ago. 2013.
NIELSEN, J.. Participation inequality: encouraging more users to contribute. Nielsen Norman Group. Social UX. Out., 2006. Disponível em: < http://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/ >. Acesso em: 10 out. 2014
NIELSEN, Michael. Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science. Oxford: Princenton University Press, 2012.
NONAKA, Ikujiro; TAKEUCHI, Hirotaka. Criação do conhecimento na empresa. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1998.
OBLIGER, Diana. Higher education in the connected age. EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 48, n. 2, mar./abr. 2013. Disponível em: http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/higher-education-connected-age. Acesso em: 2013.
OLIVA, Glaucius. CNPq anuncia dois novos critérios de avaliação de cientistas. Folha de São Paulo, São Paulo, 5 mar. 2012. Disponível em: <http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/ciencia/1057296-cnpq-anuncia-dois-novos-criterios-de-avaliacao-de-cientistas.shtml>. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2012.
PERSONAL TECHNOLOGY, CONSUMERISATION: the power of many. The Economist. 2011 (Special Report). Disponível em: <http://www.economist.com/node/21530921>. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2014.
POPPER, K. A sociedade aberta e seus inimigos. 2ª. ed. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, 1974.
POWELL, Mathilde; COLIN, Maria. Participatory paradoxes: facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down? Bulletin of Science Technology Society, v. 29, n. 4, p. 325-342, 2009.
THE PRICE OF INFORMATION: academics are starting to boycott a big publisher of journals. The Economist, fev. 2012 Disponível em: <http://www.economist.com/node/21545974>. Acesso em: 10 out. 2012.
PRIEM, Jason. et al. Altmetrics: a manifesto. 2010. Disponível em: <http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/>. Acesso em: 01 mai. 2014.
PRIEM, J.; COSTELLO, K. L. How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 47, n.1, p.1–4. 2010.
ROSEN, Evan. The culture of collaboration: Maximizing time, talent and tools to create value in the global economy. Red Ape Publishing, 2009.
SCHRANGE, Michael. No more teams!: Mastering the dynamics of creative collaboration. currency doubleday, 2005.
SIEMENS, George. Knowing knowledge. E Learn Space, 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.elearnspace.org/KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf>. Acesso em: 5 maio 2014.
SOLLA PRICE, Derek John de. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
SNOW, C. P. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. 7. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1961. Disponível em: <http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5110/snow_1959.pdf>. Acesso em: 28 abr. 2014.
SNOWDEN, Dave. Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness.
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v.29, n. 4, p. 23-28, april-may, 2003.
SUBER, Peter. Open access. MIT Press books, 2012.
SUTER, Viki; BRYAN, Alexader; KAPLAN, Pascoal. Social software and the future of conferences: right now. EDUCAUSE Review, v. 40, n. 1, p. 46–59, jan./fev. 2005.
SWAN, Alma. Policy guidelines for the development and promotion of open access. Paris: Unesco, 2012. Disponível em: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002158/215863e.pdf. Acesso em: 15 mar.2012.
TACKE, Oliver. Open science 2.0: how research and education can benefit from open innovation and web 2.0. In: Bastiaens, T. J. (Ed.); Baumöl, U. (Ed.); Krämer, B. J. (Ed.). ON COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE. Berlin: Springer, 2010. p. 37–48. Disponível em: <http://olivertacke.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Tacke-2010-Open_Science_2.0.pdf>. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2014.
THOMA, Brent; CHAN, Teresa; BENITEZ, Javier; LIN, Michelle. Educational scholarship in the digital age: a scoping review and analysis of scholarly products. The Winnower, 2014. Disponível em: <https://thewinnower.com/papers/educational-scholarship-in-the-digital-age-a-scoping-review-and-analysis-of-scholarly-products>. Acesso em: 9 out 2014.
TUOMI, Ilkka. The future of knowledge management. Lifelong Learning in Europe (LLinE), v. 7, n. 2, p. 69-79. 2002.
UNESCO Science for the Twenty-first Century: a new commitment. In: World Conference on Science Budapest Hungary, 1999. Paris: Unesco, 2000.
VÁMOS, T. The human role in the age of information. AI and Society, v. 29, n. 2, p. 277–282, 2014.
VISION, Todd. Open data and the social contract of scientific publishing. BioScience, v. 60, n. 5, p. 330–331. 2010.
WHYTE, Angus; PRYOR, Graham. Appendicies to the report open to all? Case studies in openness in research. 2010. Disponível em: < http://www.dcc.ac.uk/projects/open-science-case-studies>. Acesso em: 10 out. 2012.
ZITE. Disponível em: <http://blog.zite.com/>. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2014.
OBRAS CONSULTADAS
BERMAN, F.; FOX, G.; HEY, T. The semantic grid: a future e-science infrastructure. In: DE ROURE, David; JENNINGS, Nicholas R.; SHADBOLT, Nigel R. Grid computing: making the global infrastructure a reality. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, p. 437–470.
BJORNEBORN, L.; INGWERSEN, P. Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 55, n. 14, p. 1216-1227, 2004.
BOZEMAN, B.; CORLEY, E. Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, v. 33, n. 4, p. 599-616, 2004.
CASTELLS, Manuel. A era da intercomunicação. LeMonde Diplomatique, ago. 2006. Disponível em: <http://diplo.org.br/2006-08,a1379>. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2012.
___________. A Sociedade em Rede. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1999.
CAULFIELD, Timothy; HARMON, Shawn; JOLY, Yann. Open science versus commercialization: a modern research conflict? Genomemedicine, v. 4, n. 17, 2012. Disponível em: <http://genomemedicine.com/content/4/2/17>. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2012.
CHESBROUGH, Henry William. Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 2003.
DAVID, P.A.; BESTEN, M. D.; SCHROEDER, R. Will E-Science Be Open Science? SSRN eLibrary. 2008. Disponível em: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1317390. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2013.
GOWERS, Timothy; NIELSEN, Michael. Massively collaborative mathematics. Nature, v. 461, n. 7266, p. 879–881, 2009.
GOWERS, Timothy. Elsevier: my part in its downfall. Gowers’s Weblog: Mathematics related discussions, 21 jan. 2012. Disponível em: <http://gowers.wordpress.com/2012/01/21/elsevier-my-part-in-its-downfall/>. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2012.
HEISIG, Peter. Harmonisation of knowledge management – comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 13, n. 4, p. 4-31, 2009.
HUNTER, L.; LEAHEY, E. Collaborative research in Sociology: trends and contributing factors. The American Sociologist, v. 39, n. 4, p. 290-306, 2008
IRWIN, A. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the “New” Scientific Governance. Social Studies of Science, v. 36, n. 2, p. 299–320, 2006.
JOHNSON, Steven. Emergência: a vida integrada de formigas, cérebros, cidades e softwares. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2003.
MANESS, Jack M. Library 2.0 theory: web 2.0 and its Implications for Libraries. Webology. v. 3, n. 2, jun. 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html>. Acesso em: 16 maio 2006.
MERTON, R. K. Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, v.. 5, n. 3, 321-337, 1938.
MERTON, R. K. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations, Edited by N. W. Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
MERTON, R. K. On social structure and science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996.
MILLER, Paul; Styles, R.; Heath, T. Open data commons, a license for open data. In: Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, 2008, Beijing. Proceedings… 2008.
POYNDER, Richard. Interview with Jean-Claude Bradley: the impact of open notebook science. Information Today, set., 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.infotoday.com/IT/sep10/Poynder.shtml> Acesso em: 26 abr. 2014.
SHIRKY, Clay. A cultura da participação: criatividade e generosidade no mundo conectado. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2011.
WEINBERGER, David. A nova desordem digital. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2007.
WEISS, A. The power of collective intelligence. netWorker, v. 9, n. 3, p.16–23, 2005.
WESCHLER, D. Concept of collective intelligence. American Psychologist, v. 26, n. 10, p. 904–907, 1971.
WIGGINS, Andrea; CROWSTON, Kevin. From conservation to crowdsourc’ng: a typology of citizen science. In: International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ’10), 44., 2011, Hawaii. Proceedings… Hawaii, 2011. Disponível em: <http://crowston.syr.edu/content/conservation-crowdsourcing-typology-citizen-science>. Acesso em: 26 abr. 2014.
WIIG, Karl. Knowledge management: an emerging discipline rooted in a long story.Disponível em: <www.krii.com/downloads/km_emerg_discipl.pdf>. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2013.